The tale of
Robin Hood has been told for years from Hollywood portrayals by Kevin Costner to a fox in
the Disney animated version. Cary Elwes takes the character of Robin Hood to a
new level with an actual British accent, raunchy humor, a go-with-the-flow
attitude, and of course a love of archery. As with any Robin Hood tale the central
historical message of the film is justice. Robin returns from the Crusades to
find his home in England filled with injustice done by Prince John and the
Sheriff of Rottingham. Vowing to save the poor from the injustice and tyranny
at the hands of Prince John, Robin sets out to recruit men to reclaim the land and
along the way falls in love with Maid Marianne.
In terms of
being entirely historically accurate this film is far from it. Many modern tie-ins, such
as tennis shoes, a Medieval Playboy magazine, automatic gate-clickers, neon
exit signs, a jackhammer, photographs, automatic fires, clapper lights, and
references to Jersey, Mark Twain, and the Mississippi River, are used
throughout the movie to enhance the humor. While not historically accurate in
any way, these modern touches are common throughout most of Mel Brooks’ films
and are only added to increase the laughter of those in the audience.
Although
the film is filled with modern tie-ins that lower the historical accuracy
aspect of the film, certain weaponry, set designs, and costumes can be considered historically accurate. The opening scene of the film shows the use of longbows,
which were in fact used by the English during the Middle Ages and catapults are
also mentioned as being the “latest craze.” Stone castles are used, some
implementing the curved tower design other the square-cornered look. Stained
glass windows are implemented along with tapestries, cauldrons, Medieval
bathtubs, and Medieval toilets. Standards are seen on the castles depicting the
family’s crest that elevate the idea of the scene having occurred in the Middle
Ages. Swords, daggers, spears, and lances are all used as well to further
enhance the look of the Middle Ages. One weapon of particular interest is the
gun-like mini-crossbow used by a hit man to try and kill Robin. Mel Brooks has
balanced the use of medieval weaponry with some modern technology to enrich the
comedy throughout the movie.
Clothing is
arguably one of the most historically accurate points of the film. Male
characters are shown wearing tunics, armor or chainmail and helmets depending
on their character’s particular status. The royalty of the film, Prince John
and King Richard, are shown wearing red and gold complete with golden crowns.
Women are shown in floor-length dresses with excess amounts of fabric and
peasants are often shown wearing the colors of brown, black, and green. One
element of clothing used is a chastity belt worn by Maid Marianne. Were these
in fact common in the Middle Ages or has the chastity belt simply become a
creation of the Hollywood film industry? The clothing is the main source of the
some-what accurate portrayals of Medieval times. Clothing and the accessories
along with it present a well-rounded idea of the way in which people may have dressed
in the Middle Ages.
Overall Robin Hood: Men In Tights is not a
historically accurate film. Although it is filled with raunchy humor and hilarious
one-liners, the overuse of modern tie-ins has lowered the chances of the film
being considered “good history.” While the film cannot be considered “good
history” it must be remembered that the goal of Mel Brooks’ work is to be funny
and loosely based on history. In this sense the film is successful, as Brooks
has created a film overflowing with humor that is loosely based on the
historical legend of Robin Hood. After all is said and done, Robin Hood: Men In Tights is a hilarious
movie guaranteed to make one laugh but is not an accurate portrayal of Medieval
history.
Works Cited
Robin Hood: Men In Tights. Directed by Mel Brooks. Released in 1993.
20th Century Fox Productions,
1993. DVD, 104 minutes.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.