In keeping with a theme from the last several days, I'll go ahead and make a post about Joan in popular culture, specifically Disney's Frozen. There's one small moment in the movie that I did not catch until very recently (despite the embarrassing number of times I've watched it). It's during the "Do You Want to Build a Snowman?" song, and Anna is lamenting that she has become so lonely that she has started talking to the pictures on the wall. She points up at a painting of a woman with a sword on a horse and remarks, "Hang in there, Joan!"
As small as this moment is, it's one of the few examples when Disney references real historical figures when the movie is based in a fictional universe (this isn't counting when the entire movie is based on historical events, such as Pocahontas). It got me wondering why Disney would make that kind of reference when it could have been easily omitted and very few of their target audience would even understand the reference. I started seeing several parallels between Joan and the character of Elsa. Both women possess supernatural abilities and are sentenced to die because of them, but end up using those abilities to save their country. Disney could have easily been trying to create a comparison between Joan and Elsa, and having Anna cheer on Joan symbolized her support for Elsa as well.
This may be reaching, and it is true that the comparisons stop at the very basics. There are no religious motivations behind Elsa's actions which is a huge contrast with Joan. Even the picture of Joan in the movie secularizes her. While the horse and armor are probably both accurate, Joan's sword was supposed to have 5 crosses on it (Pernoud 61). She also carried a standard with her that depicted angels and the names of Jesus and Mary. It is unlikely that Joan would not have had that standard because she remarked at the Rouen trial that she "liked better, even forty times, my standard than my sword" and that "I bore this standard when we went forward against the enemy to avoid killing anyone" (Pernoud 62). Of course, the reason for the lack of religious undertones in Frozen is obviously because of Disney's need to remain politically correct, rather than a deliberate misinterpretation of Joan's story. However, secularizing Joan takes away so much of what she stood for and tried to accomplish. In Frozen, Joan is seen as a hero and a warrior, which is all true. Unfortunately it only scratches the surface of what her mission actually was.
Sources:
Pernoud, Regine. Joan of Arc: By Herself and Her WItnesses. Lanham, MD: Scarborough House, 1982.
Images: Google Images
9.19.2014
9.18.2014
Christina & Joan: Like Minds Centuries Apart
In the article, “Female Cross Dressing in Medieval Europe,” Valerie Hotchkiss
notes that some women in the Middle Ages, like Christina of Markyate, “dressed
as men in order to flee enforced marriages and later led holy lives as women”
(CP 55). Although Christina of Markyate simply donned masculine attire
temporarily in order to escape, her story is not entirely unlike Joan’s. For
one, both Christina and Joan had to appear in court for disputes concerning
supposed marriage contracts. In Joan’s testimony about such an occurrence, one
can see the confidence we have come to associate with her; she replied to her
questioner, “I did not have him summoned; it was he who had me summoned. And
there before the judge I swore to speak the truth and in the end he roundly
said that I had made the man no promise whatever” (Pernoud 23). Thus, the court negates any obligation on Joan’s
part for this particular marriage, as Joan implies via her direct manner that
she had nothing to do with the arrangement. Similarly, Christina of Markyate
was forced to oppose the marriage agreement set out by her parents against her
will. Investigated by authorities in the church, she is asked, “How can you
prove to me that you are doing this for the love of Christ? Perhaps you are
rejecting marriage… [for] a more wealthy one;” She stated in reply, “A more
wealthy one certainly…for who is richer than Christ?” (The Life 18). In
particular, the statement reflects a calculated approach on Christina’s part,
one rooted in a seemingly compliant, yet authoritative and subversive tone.
Christina’s answer in itself significantly recalls Joan’s own words during
her examination at Poitiers. Like Christina, Joan, rather than being
submissive, assertively responds to her interrogators and utilizes her answers
to challenge the validity or necessity of the questions in the first place. When
asked why she needed men-at-arms to carry out God’s will, she stated “By God
the men-at-arms will do battle and God will give victory,” when asked “what
language the voice spoke,” she replied “Better than yours” and if she believed
in God, “Yes, better than you,” and finally, she simply asked to be taken to
Orleans to show God’s wishes, not explain them (Pernoud 55-56). Thus, Joan somewhat
gains the upper hand in the conversation, making it less of a question of her
own intentions and more of a question of her examiners’ beliefs in the divine
at work in their world. Altogether, the similarity between Christina’s and Joan’s
replies (even if separated by three hundred years) perhaps demonstrates that
women were quite capable of navigating the public sphere to their own
advantage, even when lacking established informal or formal authority.
Sources:
Coursepacket. Dr.
Wolbrink, 2014.
The Life of
Christina Markyate. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.
Pernoud, Regine. Joan
of Arc: By Herself and Her Witnesses. Lanham: Scarborough House, 1982.
Print.
Selfish Sarcasm or Defense of Charles the Well Served?
Throughout
most of the trials Joan is seen as sarcastic and standoffish. These traits are often seen in a negative
light but there is a way that such rude remarks can be seen positively. In her trials the anti-French court is trying
to belittle Joan and possibly undermine the legitimacy of the French claim to
the throne.
Joan’s
seemingly rude and sarcastic remarks in Joan
of Arc by herself and her witnesses were made to protect the legitimacy of
her voices and of the King of France. “I asked her if she believed in God; she
answered me, ‘Yes, better than you.’” (Pernoud, 55). This remark to Guillaume Aimeri, a person loyal
to the French cause, shows how she is fighting to be taken seriously even amongst
her own people. To be taken seriously
Joan would have to show that she is more than 100% confident in the fact that
God has called her to declare war on the English.
In the
Trial of Condemnation Joan said, “There are some revelations which go to the
King of France and not to those who are questioning me.” (Pernoud, 47). The fact that she would withhold information
from the inquisitors shows that she was perhaps holding back information that
could be used against the French King.
No matter how many times they asked she would not go into the specifics
of her visions or those seen by the King.
The English could win over the French who were still loyal to Charles
VII by trying to make him to look like Charles VI, the crazy king.
Questions:
Do you think Joan was trying to protect the King, France, or
herself by withholding information?
Should she have revealed more?
Sources:
Image: Google Images
Pernoud, Regine. Joan of Arc: By Herself and Her Witnesses. Lanham: Scarbourough House, 1982. Print.
Sources:
Image: Google Images
Pernoud, Regine. Joan of Arc: By Herself and Her Witnesses. Lanham: Scarbourough House, 1982. Print.
Was Joan's cherry popped?
Last class we briefly talked
about Joan’s virginity and how Religious authorities saw virginity as a way to
salvation. Her virginity played a huge role in her life in several occasions
for example, according to the Retrials, when Joan arrives at Chinon, she was
place under an examination to which she was put at Poitiers (Pernoud, 105). She
was examined by Charles’s trusted clerics and theologians (105). The examination
must have been intense since the questionings took place for three weeks (106).
During her examination, she was tested for her virginity. This test was
performed by Queen Yolanda of Sicily, Charles VII’s mother-in-law, assisted by
some matrons and ladies of her train; examined Joan’s private to see if she was
a virgin (106). We are assuming that she was indeed a virgin since she was able
to surpass the examination and met with Charles VII.
This examination was important to
the authorities because during this time period, virginity was seen as the highest salvation and way into heaven.
If Joan was “proven” to not be a virgin, her mission may have been impossible. According
to the Retrials,” Joan’s virginity was something like a confirmation of the
truth of her mission; if she declared herself to be God’s instrument she must
be His entirely” (107). Not only does her virginity symbolize her salvation,
but it symbolizes the importance of persuading others to believe in her
mission.And it gave her the upperhand to convince others she was child of God or in this case, Christ's bride.
Sources:
Pernoud, Régine. The Retrial of Joan of Arc: The Evidence for Her Vindication. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2007. Print.
**Since I was not able to find any good images on the Middle Ages Virginity test so instead I am posting a Cherry to symbolize her innocence and purity.
9.17.2014
The Sword of Fierbois: Standard Weaponry or Authoritative Symbol?
In today's discussion we briefly touched on the subject of Joan's sword that was recovered from the church of Saint-Catherine of Fierbois. I wanted to explore this idea of a sword that Joan was told about from her voices a little further. Upon some research I discovered that Saint Catherine, the woman who the church is named after, was the patron saint of soldiers ( Jeanne d'Arc, 1). Is it any coincidence that Joan found this sword, before going to the raise the siege of Orleans, at a church whose patron saint was over soldiers?
Furthermore, the sword was not found in immaculate condition. Instead it was buried behind the alter and was rusted (Pernoud, 61). But the rust was easily removed and given to Joan. The only description available about the sword is it had five crosses on it (Saint-Joan-of-Arc, 1). Do you think there is a significance to the number of crosses present on the sword?
Today when we think of someone using a sword, especially on their way to battle, we think of dueling on the battlefield to a fight to the death but Joan did no such thing. According to the webpage "The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois", a companion of Joan's on the way to Orleans said, "I wanted to sharpen that old blade, but she said it was not necessary, as she should never kill anybody, and should carry it only as a symbol of authority" (1). Does this surprise anyone that her sword's "function" was a symbol of authority versus a weapon?
Below is an image of Joan using the sword to chase away prostitutes from the encampment. Notice that the sword is not depicted as being elaborate in any way. Do you think this has a connection to the fact that Joan was often "humble" in her appearance?
Works Cited
Pernoud, Regine. Joan of Arch: By Herself and Her Witnesses. MD: Scarborough House, 1994.
"The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois."http://www.jeanne-darc.info/p_jeanne/sword.html.
"Her Sword." 1999.http://saint-joan-of-arc.com/sword.htm.
Image from "The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois."
Furthermore, the sword was not found in immaculate condition. Instead it was buried behind the alter and was rusted (Pernoud, 61). But the rust was easily removed and given to Joan. The only description available about the sword is it had five crosses on it (Saint-Joan-of-Arc, 1). Do you think there is a significance to the number of crosses present on the sword?
Today when we think of someone using a sword, especially on their way to battle, we think of dueling on the battlefield to a fight to the death but Joan did no such thing. According to the webpage "The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois", a companion of Joan's on the way to Orleans said, "I wanted to sharpen that old blade, but she said it was not necessary, as she should never kill anybody, and should carry it only as a symbol of authority" (1). Does this surprise anyone that her sword's "function" was a symbol of authority versus a weapon?
Below is an image of Joan using the sword to chase away prostitutes from the encampment. Notice that the sword is not depicted as being elaborate in any way. Do you think this has a connection to the fact that Joan was often "humble" in her appearance?
Works Cited
Pernoud, Regine. Joan of Arch: By Herself and Her Witnesses. MD: Scarborough House, 1994.
"The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois."http://www.jeanne-darc.info/p_jeanne/sword.html.
"Her Sword." 1999.http://saint-joan-of-arc.com/sword.htm.
Image from "The Sword of Ste. Catherine de Fierbois."
History Through Parody
In keeping with this week’s apparent theme for Joan in pop
culture, I have found a YouTube video song entitled “Horrible Histories- Joan
of Arc” that is both (somewhat) historically accurate, all while maintaining a
sarcastic tone that is so often found in pop culture references to Joan. The
video gives an entire “history” of Joan starting from the time she heard voices
to her trial and death at the stake. To narrow down a topic, however, let’s
stick with discussing the video’s illustration of Joan’s mission in regards to
King Charles VII, and the male soldiers’ impressions of her as a warrior.
To view the video, click the link below!
The video first mentions Charles as the Dauphin Joan was
determined to have crowned the rightful heir to the French throne, a title the English
had usurped in the Treaty of Troyes. Pretty good history! The next mention of
Charles skips past Joan’s initial encounter entirely, and, interestingly
enough, moves to his assertion that she could in fact have an army and precede
to Orleans. The artist then proceeds to discuss how Joan inspired men in
battle, impressing them as a “mascot.” While the idea of Joan as a mascot is
arguable, it is without doubt from testimony at her Nullification Trial that
the men associated with Joan on her journey regarded her as ignorant in all
things aside from war. Noting how impressed they appeared to be in light of her
military knowledge and strategy.
The video covers many topics that will pertain to our study
of Joan in the subsequent weeks, as well as topics we previously covered
including her male dress and feisty responses to the judges at the Rouen Trial.
Interestingly enough, the video makes a point to quote word for word some of
Joan’s sarcastic answers, indicating the artist knew more than perhaps the
average parody-maker in terms of Joan’s trial records and overall history. While
the video is slightly comical, it also raises several accurate topics regarding
Joan, earning it a grade of B+ from me.
To view the video, click the link below!
9.15.2014
The honorable knight or the honorable killer?
When you come across the term
knight during the 12th century, what come to mind? My first description,
usually follows: defender, loyalty, strong, and brave. In the movie Kingdom of
Heaven directed by Ridley Scott in 2005 starred with actors such as
Orlando Bloom, Eva Green, and Liam Neeson, he portrays the crusaders in such
positive qualities, such like the description that I used to describe knights
during the 12th century. The opening of the movie starts with a sorrow choir
music, as it shows Balian’s dead wife. Balian (the main character), a black
smith who lives in a remote village in France, is showing us his memories of
his beloved wife. We know she has committed suicide because according to
Wikipedia during the Middle Ages the Christian church excommunicated people who
attempted suicide and those who died by suicide were buried outside consecrated
graveyards (Wikipedia). The movie starts to get more interesting once Baron
Godfrey of Ibelin shows up to Balian asking him to return to Jerusalem with
him. As the young Balian refuses his father’s proposal, he encounters with his
younger brother who claims he is the one that order to behead his wife. It was
then during the confrontation that Balian kills him. In desperation Balian
seeks for his father, in hope that he can help him, here is the conversation:
Balian of Ibelin: I have done... murder.
Godfrey of Ibelin: Haven't we all.
Balian of Ibelin: Is it true that in Jerusalem I can erase
my sins... and those of my wife? Is it true?
Godfrey of Ibelin: We can find out together (Heaven of
Kingdom).
The journey to Jerusalem then
begins after Balian follows his father in hope that redemption can save him and
his wife. The director Scott does a good job of depicting the 12th century
costumes, for example the famous splayed cross, was wore emblazoned on their
mantles on almost every knight in battle. The costumes included chain mail
hauberk, coats of plates or armored surcoats.
In this image of the movie the knights are wearing their
armored with the splayed crosses.
Above is an image of 12th century knights with the splayed crosses.
The director Scott represented the Middle Ages on a pretty
accurate scale based off of historical look of the film. He even used necessary
weapons during war that would prove the accuracy time period. The knights used
swords, spears, shields, and horses during the battle and the director shows plenty
of the war battles with the crusaders with these types of weapons.
You can see the general on the right with his armor, sword,
and spear.
The film’s accuracy between the
plot and the authentic link to history is somewhat accurate. There were
Christian crusaders traveling to the Holy Land during this time period in hope
of spreading Christianity. But our character Balian, he travels to Jerusalem in
hope for redemption rather than for a Christian pilgrim. But that is what makes
the plot appealing to a 21st century audience. Similar to most of our films
today, directors and writers show the importance of love and his sensitivity of his feelings. And in this film,
Balian’s love for his wife shows his devotion to go to Jerusalem and clear her
sins.
In the film, the director portrays different sides of a knight such as his ability to love and other positive qualities during the 12th century. Rather
the common misjudgments of the Middle Ages as a dark, barbaric, and cruel time
in history. He shows the status of the crusaders by expressing their strength and vulnerability. The
knights were depicted as heroes and defenders of the Christians in Jerusalem
and fighting for what they believe in. Similar to our class discussions about
Joan’s loyalty to her mission. Joan had a mission assign to her by God, and she
did not stop until she was able to crown King Charles and led the French in
battle. Similar to Balian's mission. His goal was to not only find hope and
redemption but to serve the people of Jerusalem after the fact that his father Godfrey knights
him and orders him to serve the King of Jerusalem and protect the people. Here
is another quote from Kingdom of Heaven:
Jerusalem: Who do you think you are? Will you alter the
world? Does making a man a knight make him a better fighter?
Balian of Ibelin: [pause, turn slowly to face Bishop] Yes
(Kingdom of Heaven).
Above is an image of Balian at battle.
We often portray miracles with the
Middle Ages. There is a scene in the film, that shows Balian and his father's
men returning to Jerusalem, but during their voyage, they encounter a storm
that wrecks the ship, leaving the only survivors Balian and the horse. One
would say it's a miracle that he survived on that ship wreck. Second, Balian
was completely lost in the desert while he was looking for his horse. Then Balian
encounters a Muslim cavalier and his servant. Due to a fight over the horse,
the Muslim cavalier is left dead and Balian spares the servant’s life in return
that he would help guide him into the City. Balian miraculous survives on all
of these near death situations.
In conclusion, I would conclude that
the director portray the film historically accurate based off of his historical
look of the film. And this includes his amazing details of the dramatic choir
music, costumes, and scenery of the battles. I argued that the director
portrays his crusaders in such a light such as revealing his humanity side such of love.The
film ends with the battle of Jerusalem ending with terms negotiated between
Balian and Saladin and the director closes the film with an epilogue stating
that "nearly a thousand years later, peace in the Kingdom of Heaven
remains elusive"(Kingdom of Heaven).
Sources:
Kingdom of Heaven. Dir. Ridley. Scott. Perf. Orlando Bloom,
Eva Green, and Liam Neeson. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation,2005. DVD.
Images were from Google.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)